NJEA welcomes discussion of longer day/year

Preschool, kindergarten, funding, facilities top list of issues

Published on Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Wendell SteinhauerNJEA President Wendell Steinhauer released the following statement regarding Gov. Christie’s State of the State proposals on the length of the school day and school year:

“I welcome the opportunity to sit down with Gov. Christie and the Department of Education to discuss the benefits and challenges of implementing an extended school day and school year.  That discussion must include educators and parents as well, to ensure that all concerns are taken into account and it should be based on research and evidence.

Why a veto of full-day kindergarten study?

“I also challenge Gov. Christie to demonstrate the sincerity of his proposal by renouncing yesterday’s veto of a bill creating a task force to study issues associated with implementing full-day kindergarten across New Jersey.  Full-day kindergarten, in districts where it does not already exist, would immediately double the length of the school day for tens of thousands of young students at a critical time in their development. The benefits of full-day kindergarten are clear and well-documented.  NJEA has consistently supported full-day kindergarten and urges its implementation statewide.

30,000 children eligible for expanded preschool

“I also invite Gov. Christie to begin working with us to ensure access to full-day preschool for more New Jersey children.  Under the school funding formula, preschool should be available to at least 30,000 more students across the state. Research on the benefits of early childhood education is unambiguous and the benefits are significant.  Unfortunately, Gov. Christie has consistently refused to invest the resources needed to provide the opportunities for children that the law calls for.  NJEA has consistently supported full-day preschool.

Aid formula already underfunded by $5 billion

“I also invite the governor to have a serious conversation about the resources needed to lengthen the school day and year.  Gov. Christie has already underfunded New Jersey’s school funding formula by $5.1 billion in his first term.  Districts must be confident that the state is willing and able to support what they are already doing before they are asked to expand their offerings.  NJEA has consistently called for full funding of the school funding law to ensure that our students have every possible opportunity to learn and succeed.

Facilities need air conditioning, repair

“Additionally, an expanded school year would put significant pressure on districts to upgrade facilities.  Currently, far too many school buildings have no air conditioning.  That already creates a challenging and often dangerous environment for students and school staff.  Expanding the school year into the summer would greatly exacerbate that problem and require immediate action to ensure that every student has a safe, healthy environment that is conducive to learning.  Unfortunately, over the last four years, Gov. Christie has refused to release funds through the Schools Development Authority to allow dozens of districts to make critical health and safety improvements in buildings. NJEA has consistently supported measures to ensure that all classrooms are maintained at safe temperatures and with safe conditions.

Local negotiations are central to the discussion

“Ultimately, these are decisions that must be discussed and determined at the local district level.  As Gov. Christie wrote in his veto of the full-day kindergarten task force bill, ‘the decision of whether to offer a full-day program should reside with local boards of education and their constituents.’  It is equally true that those boards and those constituents, including parents and educators, should have the final say on the length of their school day and school year.  New Jersey has a well-established collective bargaining system that provides the legal process by which districts can implement such changes once they are agreed upon. NJEA has consistently supported the use of collective bargaining to help make such important educational decisions.

“Several districts across New Jersey have already negotiated longer school days and school year for students.  Other districts have negotiated longer school years for staff to ensure more time for professional learning.  We should look closely at the experience in those districts to learn whether such increases in instructional time enhance students’ learning and well-being.

More time – or better use of time?

“The welfare of students must be carefully considered. Before any changes are implemented, we must ensure that they are truly in the best interests of students and not simply politically expedient.  Many high school students are already on buses before 7:00 in the morning.  If they participate in sports or other after-school activities, they may return home after 6:00 and still have several hours of homework.  We need to determine whether a longer school day is in their best interests.  Many students of all ages are spending far too much class time preparing for high stakes standardized tests, rather than engaging in real learning.  They may not need a longer school day but rather better use of the instructional time already available.

“Students in New Jersey face many challenges, and many factors affect their academic success.  We welcome a comprehensive discussion with all stakeholders about how best to provide the education they need and deserve.”


Bookmark and Share

More News

  • Steinhauer: Sweeney pension proposal deserves close look

    NJEA President Wendell Steinhauer issued this statement following a press conference at which Senate President Steve Sweeney proposed the creation of a federal pension loan program to help states improve their pension funding levels. “We are glad that Senate President Sweeney continues to explore every possible option for helping New Jersey responsibly meet its pension obligations. As the Senator noted, this does not change the need for New Jersey to meet its current pension obligations immediately. However, this approach deserves a very close look because of its potential to lower costs for New Jersey taxpayers while making workers’ pensions more secure.Read More

  • Steinhauer: No pension discussions with Christie

    “We will not concede one inch to this governor”

    At a recent campaign stop in New Hampshire, Gov. Christie rejected the idea of revising the state’s pension funding schedule, instead insisting on further pension reductions. In light of his atrocious record on pension funding, even following the pension reductions imposed on public employees in 2011, NJEA President Wendell Steinhauer issued the following statement rejecting the idea of any further discussion or negotiation with the governor on pensions: “Chris Christie is very busy these days running for president, so I’ll keep this short: he doesn’t need to worry about wasting precious campaign time discussing changes to New Jersey’s pension system because we have no intention of negotiating anything with this governor.Read More

  • “It’s time for Chris Christie to resign.”

    New Jersey Education Association President Wendell Steinhauer released the following statement regarding Gov. Chris Christie’s announced presidential campaign:“Running New Jersey is a full-time job, and New Jersey residents deserve a full-time governor. “We face big problems in this state. Our credit rating is a disaster.  Our unemployment rate is high. Our economic growth is slow. Our infrastructure is crumbling. Our pensions are in crisis. Our schools are underfunded.  And now our governor has abandoned the job he has to campaign for the job he really wants.Read More

  • Steinhauer schools Christie on ‘reality’

    NJEA President Wendell Steinhauer issued the following statement in response to Governor Christie’s comments from Iowa that unions “need to get realistic” about pension funding: “By all means, governor, let’s get realistic. “Here’s the reality: you signed a law promising to fund our pensions, and you broke it. Here’s another reality: the Supreme Court acknowledged our members’ non-forfeitable right to their pensions.  They simply let you off the hook for fully funding our pensions on a constitutional technicality."Read More